I’ve been sitting in the video editing room at our Institute for the last 1.5 hours to capture and digitalize the material from our recording session on sunday. By now, I’m sick of it… I’m experiencing frustration because of the recorded material, my stomache aches due to intensive feelings of hunger, and after all the idea to sit alone in the editing room creates an intensive feeling of utter boredom. Why is life so mean? ;)

Being inspired by an entry on the Problogger’s entry to protect my feeds from copyright theft, I added the following to my RSS and Atom Feeds which can be easily included in your own Blogspirit-Templates:

Comments

{$post.permalink}#comments


© 2005 by Mike Schnoor on www.mikeschnoor.com – This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you’re not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you’re looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me to take legal action immediately.

We’ve been talking earlier in our group for the Regional Development – Election 2005 course about the weekly workload for the project, and since I remember the workload from the last term in respect to the Disney Project, I thought our lector James might like to know how much time we spend on the Election Project. Here’s our schedule as a small history since last week’s class:

Thursday: 1-2 hours article research and a little bit publishing

Friday: 2 hours preparation for the weekly assignment, mostly reading and researching

Saturday: 2 hours researching and writing for sunday’s article update

Sunday: 3-4 hours for recording our video material

Monday: 2-4 hours for the weekly assignment in the evening hours (50% research, 20% debate and 30% writing)

Tuesday: 1-2 hours researching for news, articles, etc.

Wednesday: 2 hours before class debate and preparation or latest updates

Thursday: tomorrow we plan to cut our video material which might last 4-5 hours in Munketoft – it will include a) a „news magazine interview“ and preparation for the suggested b) election tv advertisement

Furthermore, we have established some contact to native Filipinos. At first, probably each week, Katharina is contacting other students via the internet on a regular base; and about three weeks ago we spent one evening talking with a native Filipino face to face. These „real“ contacts give us the opportunity to get some deeper insight than only reading articles.

James asked me simply if we’d 1) enjoy it and if 2) we feel that our future is enriched by this – and that’s what Katharina and I replied – expressing only our thoughts:

1) Not only the fact that we get trained in writing academic work or conducting some „pseudo-journalism“ for the website, we have something useful to do for a course instead of crafting a piece of work with which we cannot identify ourselves.

Basically, for us the idea of working in a group means to have several conflicts as in different opinions, techniques, etc. — in the end, it’s just management of ourselves as „friends AND professionals“. We like to work, but it depends on the quantity and quality of the work – and of course the work has to disburse … with a final mark AND satisfaction of ourselves. This of course is in our case only useful with term-papers or presentations or projects… not with the classic written-2-hour-lasting-tests. While I’m worse there than in project courses (and that keeps frustrating me), Katharina has a better go on them.

2) As mentioned above, we like to increase our knowledge – in either especializing ourselves in different topics, just one key item, or by adapting ideas and using them for the future… that’s perhaps one reason why I for example chose to participate in the variety of your courses. You keep offering us a challenge and knowledge which cannot be found in the other courses – flatness, basic simplicity, tradition and dullness is found in those courses which are considered as majoring subjects (law, economy, psychology, statistics, spanish) or taught by flat-thinking people. While Katharina and I would like to become managers, we’d rather choose to know about people, cultures and languages – and your courses are the only choice except the compulsory stuff from the spanish department.

In this course we clearly get to know how to write academic papers „better as before“, we can play around with our knowledge of websites (I don’t just do it all by myself even if it looked as if), and we are able to use different elements such as our planned videos. And on the other hand, where can we delve into a culture like the Philippines except in project oriented courses? This gives us a clear advantage for the future in business situations and private „encounters“ with other cultures. Both of us established a deeper contact to some spanish speaking teachers like Rafael Tito and William Taranzona instead of accepting them as „far away people“ – but that happened only because of our … let’s say… cultural openness. While I primarily lived in Germany, Katharina experienced the French, the Americans and Portuguese in exchange programs or employment overseas – basically, we don’t plan to live in Germany in the future – that’s perhaps another reason why we like such things – including the idea of working more than being copycats.

This morning a full scale war has been unleashed by our enigmatic forces: Katharina and Mike were facing the consequences of a relationship war. Our relationship was crumbling under both of our attacks, and in the end, we were angrily sad, and both of our minds were pushed towards a limited stress-accepting capacity. Fortunately, we got things settled… what a morning. Now off to University for Desarollo Regional 2 and the course’s joyful participants!

I wonder why there’s no really important happening in the Blogosphere… reading blog and news feeds got very boring today?

Which result do you get if you have separate responsibilities in the University’s institute? There is a central website from the institute which informs each student about any course cancelations. In addition each professorship has its own website to give access to the course related materials – and sometimes these website contain small inputs about the courses… like this morning! Back at home, Kat and I found the information hidden deeply within the Occupational- and Organisational Psychology course website – it was cancelled without prior notice. Since about only 15 of approximately 150 people usually attend the course, it was quite difficult to determine if the lesson would take place or not.

Current Mood: Relaxed – finally!
Currently Listening: King of Queens in the TV

Was bringen Kommentare wirklich? Eine rege Diskussion, viele zusätzliche Informationen… aber jede Menge Probleme für den jeweiligen Autor. Beim Feed-Lesen stieß ich soeben auf folgende fünf Thesen (grob übersetzt!):

1. Je mehr Kommentare man hat, desto weniger wird man verlinkt – Kommentare verschlechtern das Ranking
2. Die Leute schreiben besseres auf ihren eigenen Blogs als in den Kommentaren – mehr Qualität und Wert
3. Gewinner statt Verlierer sein – als Pseudo A-Listen Blogger
4. Das Ambiente ohne Foren-Kommentar-Trolle siegt – bessere Argumentationen
5. Spam, welcher Spam? – das Leben wird einfacher

Mehr dazu gibt es im via ProBlogger und BlogSavvy. Aber die Diskussion zu Kommentaren (und den Sinn und Zweck jener) ist wohl nie beendet, solange es die üblichen Spielkinder vom Texas Hold’em Poker oder der sinnfreien Kommunikation gibt… sobald man aber gezwungen ist, in seinem eigenen Weblog darüber zu schreiben, wird man sicherlich die anderen Autoren verlinken – wie es der gute Ton laut Nico ja verlangt.

Time to go! Is it time to go? Yes it is. Okay. Now move up! Sure. Will you? Yes. It’s late, we gotta go! Okay. – this can sound like a typical discussion once Kat is under pressure for leaving to university. Well, yes, I’m under pressure too but not that much. I better go because she gave me an evil look….

Bis vor wenigen Minuten saß unser Action-Team in einem kleinen Seminarraum getrennt von den anderen, um in schon detaillierten Zügen unseren Marketingplan zu schreiben. Wir stecken vom Zeitplan her im „External Environment“ und werden für den morgigen Vormittag und den Rest des Tages alle anderen Punkte zusammenstellen. Für heute sehe ich nur noch desillusionierte Teilnehmer, die am liebsten nach Hause fahren würden, jedoch sich noch einer Fragestunde hingeben müssen, in der dilletantische Fragen aufkeimen und bestenfalls durch knappe präzise Antworten erstickt werden sollten. Ich hoffe auf ein baldiges Ende… und verabschiede mich in das geistige Nirvana. Good fight, good night!

Während des Vortrages von Harm U. Mensing durfte unser Professor größtenteils zuhören, und dieses Zuhören äußerte sich durch die Aussage, es „sei unglaublich anstrengend„. Der Vortrag vom Spezialisten für Supply Chain Management und Logistik war in seiner Form rund und angenehm verständlich, was sich auch an dem plötzlich auftretenden rigorosem Interesse der Teilnehmer widerspiegelte. Auch für einen „Allrounder-Studenten“, wie er in unserem International Management Studiengang trainiert wird, hat beste Chancen sich auf internationalem Sektor mit mindestens einer weiteren Fremdsprache zu Deutsch und Englisch zu profilieren.

Anmerkung: Die Pause ist ein unglaublicher Moment, der sehr befreiend wirkt. Zu Hause sprang ich kurz unter die Dusche, dann raste ich mit offenem Verdeck im Auto wieder zurück – und die Hitze lastet immernoch trotz Fahrtwind auf dem Körper und Geist. Den Rest der Kotler’schen Präsentationen möchte ich mir nicht antun, und so haben wir spontan eine kleine Arbeitsgruppe gebildet, die sich im Raum nebenan mit dem Marketingplan beschäftigen kann. Wunderschön ruhig, wunderschön kühl, und natürlich entspannend.

Zur Zeit ist Lesestunde an der Tagesordnung, was sich auf den Beispielplan begrenzt. Ebenfalls betreibe ich ein wenig Online Recherche zu unserem Marketingplan, welcher entweder ein zukünftiges Modell oder die schon etablierte Ausgabe der Sportyacht „Racer Cruiser“ als Produkt zu Grundlage hat.

A very interesting lecture was given by Harm U. Mensing who is partner of the Conclusion Group, Hamburg – a management consultancy company. He’s specialized for managing one of the 15 main branches of the company – the logistics department in the supply chain management. So far, so good – something new in comparison to the referendum of the Kotler book done by our professor. Not that I dislike hearing my professor about this topic, I rather share no interest to hear the already prepared material again… Unfortunately, I was unable to find a reference on the internet for the guest lector Mensing, but perhaps I haven’t searched deeply enough.

Update: Harm U. Mensing